<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nadine Dorries and what she has (and has not) learned from Iain Dale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/</link>
	<description>Tim Ireland on tabloids, media, blogs and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: farnboro</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/comment-page-1/#comment-25655</link>
		<dc:creator>farnboro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerheads.com/wp/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/#comment-25655</guid>
		<description>Witnesses giving oral evidence to select committees normally submit written evidence in advance.This evidence is usually published either before, or at the time of, the evidence session in question: so, for instance, hard copies of the Wyatt evidence would have been available in the committee room for anyone to read and take away at the time Wyatt was giving evidence.This is pretty standard procedure, and ought to be common knowledge to select committee members who are, erm, actually paying attention . . . </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witnesses giving oral evidence to select committees normally submit written evidence in advance.This evidence is usually published either before, or at the time of, the evidence session in question: so, for instance, hard copies of the Wyatt evidence would have been available in the committee room for anyone to read and take away at the time Wyatt was giving evidence.This is pretty standard procedure, and ought to be common knowledge to select committee members who are, erm, actually paying attention . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster Blogster</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/comment-page-1/#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster Blogster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerheads.com/wp/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/#comment-25654</guid>
		<description>I fear I didn&#039;t help here. She had a post by &quot;Peter&quot; which said she would make a big announcement at 1 minute past midnight. I chanced by at 3 minutes past, and commented along the lines of:&quot;It&#039;s three minutes past now. Have you changed your mind?&quot;I never saw the comment displayed but I did note that the big announcement wasn&#039;t posted until 8 minutes past. The women was seven minutes late. Or just daft to predict that she could post things to 1 minute accuracy. She needs to get a blogger account where you can just fix the date/time to one that suits  :-)Now she&#039;s gone off in a huff. Would you describe her as a bit touchy? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear I didn&#039;t help here. She had a post by &quot;Peter&quot; which said she would make a big announcement at 1 minute past midnight. I chanced by at 3 minutes past, and commented along the lines of:&quot;It&#039;s three minutes past now. Have you changed your mind?&quot;I never saw the comment displayed but I did note that the big announcement wasn&#039;t posted until 8 minutes past. The women was seven minutes late. Or just daft to predict that she could post things to 1 minute accuracy. She needs to get a blogger account where you can just fix the date/time to one that suits  :-)Now she&#039;s gone off in a huff. Would you describe her as a bit touchy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Piper</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/comment-page-1/#comment-25656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Piper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerheads.com/wp/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/#comment-25656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Nadine Norris a blogging MP...&lt;/strong&gt; 
 
... or a self-serving egotist who strokes her own ego in public? Tim has got the answer.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Nadine Norris a blogging MP&#8230;</strong> </p>
<p>&#8230; or a self-serving egotist who strokes her own ego in public? Tim has got the answer&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bookdrunk</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/comment-page-1/#comment-25653</link>
		<dc:creator>bookdrunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggerheads.com/wp/2007/11/nadine_dorries_iain_dale/#comment-25653</guid>
		<description>The first post on Dorries&#039; new comment-free blog is entitled &quot;Chatterbox!&quot;Oh, the irony. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first post on Dorries&#039; new comment-free blog is entitled &quot;Chatterbox!&quot;Oh, the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.bloggerheads.com @ 2012-02-10 02:56:30 -->
