Comments on: My submission to the Home Office for the public consultation on SOCPA

By: Henry North

Henry North — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:43:55 +0000

Great video Both me and Rachel have plugged it on our blogs… Needs to be on telly if you ask me

By: Matt Wardman

Matt Wardman — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:14:00 +0000

Excellent, and very clear.I will post and plug.Went to MT in Nottingham. Has GB been served with his writ, yet?Matt

By: Scaryduck

Scaryduck — Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:43:41 +0000

Well done, that man.

By: Manic

Manic — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:02:03 +0000

Cheers, SE.Thanks, Paul. I take it you see the importance of the anti-Christmas carol service now.:o)

By: Surreptitious Evil

Surreptitious Evil — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:29:15 +0000

Absolutely excellent. I just hope you have more luck than we did with the RIPA Pt III CoP and PaJA s35-37 "consultations".

By: Paul Linford

Paul Linford — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:58:24 +0000

Sheer genius.

By: Manic

Manic — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:06:40 +0000

Thanks, everybody.mou: Thought about it for quite a bit before doing it. It's the only way to describe the situation truthfully. Besides, they don't always like us to know it, but the workers at the Home Office are people, too.:o)

By: mou

mou — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:17:26 +0000

Very well thought out – nicely done.Although I can't help wondering whether it'll be taken seriously or dismissed the second they see the word "turd" (thats if they got any further than the youtube link…)

By: pro_tempore

pro_tempore — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:59:09 +0000

Pick your superlative of choice, Tim. You've earned it! :-)

By: Paul.Ferrari

Paul.Ferrari — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:48:54 +0000

*claps*Very Good.