|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2009 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Election night: a few notices | Main | Isn't anybody going to help that poor woman? » November 3, 2008Andrew Gilligan: more sock-puppets foundI'm waiting to see a firm denial from Gilligan. When you're ready, Andrew.... Meanwhile, bloggers who suspect that they may be a victim of these shenanigans may want to check their stats/back-end for visits from 'Associated Newspapers Ltd' (and/or the IP range 195.234.240.0 - 195.234.243.255). - UPDATE - Dave Hill challenges Gilligan on sock-puppeting on the Guardian website, prompting this 'denial' involving comments made under the 'kennite' profile, made using Gilligan's usual profile: andrewgilligan The 'fascist' tag is pretty subtle, but there's a clear attack on Hill, and the "Don't you have anything better to do (than catch me cheating)?" tactic is textbook. And, of course, there's the statement that 'kennite' is a partner, which isn't quite a denial. Life partner? Business partner? Did 'Kennite' post the comments or did A.G. post the comments using their profile? And this does nothing to explain the trail of anonymous comments he has left in his wake elsewhere. - UPDATE - Behind the bluster you will find long silences, careful words and few denials from Andrew Gilligan. This thread is now officially interesting. Beware of trolls. Posted by Manic on November 3, 2008 10:30 AM in the category The Political Weblog Movement Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments A partner who happens to talk the same, share the same views and write the same articles? I don't know about you, but my missus certainly doesn't do any of those. Of course, this is really an admission of sock-puppeting, since if we'd *known* that kennite was umbilically linked to/actually Gilligan, we'd have been in a better position to argue than where we actually were, which was having the false impression that he was an entirely separate individual. Channelling his attacks through 'kennite' therefore puts his opponents at a disadvantage, which was presumably the point. To take one rather mundane example, I took 'kennite' to task on Boriswatch for misinformation on Routemaster fleets and capacities. Knowing what I do now, I'd have written a different article. Gilligan is a piece of work, though - this story came out last week, the blogs covered it then with nary a peep out of him. Dave Hill was actually away and, given where his stuff appears, has to be far more careful of legalities. To see that delay as a cause for attack is despicable. Posted by: Tom at November 3, 2008 5:23 PM - "A partner who happens to talk the same, share the same views and write the same articles?" Lucky man; he appears to have married a clone of himself. Roll on, Rimmerworld. (Avert your eyes from her great beauty!) Posted by: Manic at November 3, 2008 5:40 PM - This would be the same Gilligan who's been nominated for the Paul Foot Award for Campaigning Journalism? Nice to see investigative journalists holding themselves to such high standards. Posted by: chickenlittle at November 3, 2008 11:12 PM - Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |