That is all.
That is all.
Some updates or titbits may appear in this post.
It’s 4pm in London, 11am in New York and 7am in Alaska.
1. You’ll need perspective from Atrios before you step into this pool or any pool like it, as there’ll be rogue agents, power-playing wannabes and many, many excitable puppies editing almost every wiki in the western world today.
2. Early morning ‘I voted’ threads can be found at the following locations if you’re interested in catching a vibe or two, but please do keep in mind that some neighbourhoods are more friendly than others and today is not a good day to start barging in anywhere, especially not on the last thread in this list:
– Fark: A deeply cynical but jocular mix of left and right.
– Wonkette: Leftish, but quite even-handed with it.
– Democratic Underground: Really quite far to the left.
– FreeRepublic: All the way over there to the right. No, further… no, back past “Obama’s grandmother is faking it!”. There you go.
4. Hahahahaha! I’ve only just seen this via TPM, so do excuse me; Sarah Palin promised that she would release her medical records but, on the eve of the election, she’s now offering a two-page letter from her doctor. (Ooooh, she’ll have trouble with electoral observers if she forgot her note from home today.)
UPDATE – And I’ll mention again that I’ll be live blogging over at Liberal Conspiracy this evening.
She is way, way wayyyyy out of her depth. Please let today be the end of it. For a while, at least.
I’m waiting to see a firm denial from Gilligan. When you’re ready, Andrew….
Meanwhile, bloggers who suspect that they may be a victim of these shenanigans may want to check their stats/back-end for visits from ‘Associated Newspapers Ltd’ (and/or the IP range 184.108.40.206 – 220.127.116.11).
Nov 03 08, 4:06pm
Kennite is my partner. Is that allowed? I’ve always been perfectly happy, as you acknowledge, to point out the shortcomings in your journalism under my own name. Even by the standards of the Ken Left, it strikes me as more than usually bizarre to accuse me of concealing my true views about our former mayor and his online fan club.
It’s also good to see such a sure sense of priorities. On the day of a major mayoral policy launch about a trivial subject like knife crime, you’re focusing on the issues that really matter.
The ‘fascist’ tag is pretty subtle, but there’s a clear attack on Hill, and the “Don’t you have anything better to do (than catch me cheating)?” tactic is textbook.
And, of course, there’s the statement that ‘kennite’ is a partner, which isn’t quite a denial.
Life partner? Business partner? Did ‘Kennite’ post the comments or did A.G. post the comments using their profile?
And this does nothing to explain the trail of anonymous comments he has left in his wake elsewhere.
1. On election night, I’ll be hanging around over at Liberal Conspiracy and chatting/live-blogging as time allows.
2. Early in the evening, I plan to kill time by watching Blazing Saddles instead of coverage. I doubt I’ll need to change gears on the resulting commentary.
3. The fight always gets dirtiest on the eve of an election (example), so watch your step and be careful what you give precious oxygen to.
4. At some stage, you’ll be needing this. Keep a link handy.
And to think that it was only a fortnight ago that the big story was toff Tory-boy Cameron and his toff bean-counter Osborne having secret meetings on the yachts of the super-rich, with the latter being urged to shut the hell up by the servants of Murdoch.
After all, it just wouldn’t do to reveal that Murdoch plans to have as much influence over that Tory leader as he did over the last
Tory leader Prime Minister:
Guardian – Memo shows how Blair aided Murdoch: A newly disclosed Downing Street memo has revealed how Tony Blair helped Rupert Murdoch overcome an official investigation which was jeopardising one of his big investments. It shows that Blair, while prime minister, immediately ordered his top officials to help the tycoon who was frustrated that a potentially lucrative scheme was being blocked by a long-running European commission investigation. Blair told the media magnate that “he was instinctively sympathetic to what Murdoch was aiming to achieve”. The tycoon eventually won approval for the plan. BSkyB had teamed up with other big companies to develop an interactive scheme in which people could shop and manage their finances through their televisions. The memo is the first to be disclosed under freedom of information legislation documenting the contents of meetings between Murdoch and Blair. Blair has been accused of granting political favours to Murdoch in return for support from his newspapers; Lance Price, a former Downing Street spin doctor, said Murdoch seemed to be one of the four most influential people in the administration.
[OK, move along, nothing to see here, just a media tycoon wanting to help the little people to manage their finances.]
There was even some talk at the time on many Conservative weblogs about how desperately unfair the BBC had been in their attempts to ‘keep the Obsborne story going’ (example).
But last week things took a suddenly turn sideways as the poor, struggling, put-upon tabloids somehow managed to make that story an irrelevance overnight by giving the BBC a monstering with some good old-fashioned fabricated outrage.
But I’m sure David Cameron is a good man and above an*….
Oh, sorry. My mistake. Turns out he’s an opportunistic twat and a hypocrite after all.
Here he is writing exclusively for the Scum today:
The Scum – Bloated BBC out of touch with the viewers: The BBC has lost touch with the values of the people who support it through the licence fee. How could anyone who works at an organisation that prides itself as socially responsible possibly have approved broadcasting the sick telephone calls made by Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand?
Way to howl with the wolves, Captain Custard. You’re a real man of the people.
(I wonder if David Cameron shares Nadine Dorries’ recent socialist leanings; it seems she wants to carve these ‘bloated’ salaries up and hand them out to struggling families.)
Just in case anybody wants a word. You know; to me and not about me. Cheers.
(Be prepared to be left waiting. Indefinitely. That’s how the pros do it… or so I’m led to understand.)
Lib Dem Voice – The curious case of Nadine Dorries’s website traffic: …the claim of 800,000 readers (or any reasonable variation on the term ‘readers’) looks to be wrong. I twice contacted Nadine Dorries’s office asking for an explanation or correction, once by email and once by phone, but have not received any response
1. Perhaps Mark could ask Nadine a question about her claims. On her ‘blog’ that doesn’t allow comments.
More below the fold ————————————->
The part that really stings is the link to the ‘kennite’ profile, and comments like this.
UPDATE – Hahahahahahahahaha! Ouch! Ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch!