« Home | Initial reactions to the April pamphlet » | Another cat escapes the bag! » | Now, now.... » | That's Conservative *action*, folks! » | Meet Dennis Paul » | Up-joined thinking it was, hrmmm....? » | Mike Chambers revisited » | Anne Milton's latest pamphlet » | Anne Milton: exploring the possibilities of astrol... » | Anne Milton: why this weblog exists » 

Thursday, April 07, 2005 

Late changes to the April pamphlet

Hmm. Something else just popped up... why was this change necessary, do you think?



Current theories:

1. It's a pretty awful scan, but that *doesn't* look like Sue Doughty to me. Maybe the image was dropped because a caption change to 'Anne with some lady' didn't quite cut it.

2. If that is Sue Doughty, then perhaps her minders thought that a direct comparison would not work in Anne's favour.

3. Perhaps - just perhaps - they dropped this photo because a few moments after it was taken, Anne lost control and ate the toddler.

Anyone else?

Labels:

The photo was taken in daylight and not at dusk when creatures of the night emerge....

- | -

You also might want to ask Anne what Kat Fletcher (who I'm pretty sure that is in the top left-hand corner) thinks of the Tories. Because she's been pretty darn vocal against her this past week at the NUS conference...

Hardly a ringing endorsement :p

- | -

I've almost given up on asking Anne questions. When I email her, she ignores me - and when I call her, she tries to sidestep the substance of any query by insisting that I'm driven by blind hatred or anger.

- | -

Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link

About me

    Hi. I'm Tim. I live in Guildford. I've built a few political weblogs here and there. If you're wondering why I decided to start this particular blog, click here.

Pluggage

    Save the Royal Surrey

Reference

Blogroll

Archives

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates