|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2004-2006 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« An evil so very, very great... | Main | Hurrah! » July 28, 2005Busy today - and probably tomorrowThere's work to be sorted and planning to do for the exclusion zone protest next Monday August 1st. If you're new here, you can follow my concerns about the exclusion zone and the issues that surround it by clicking here or poking your way around this category. I'll be working on some posters... suggestions for slogans or themes are welcome. Additionally, I urge you to promote this protest on your weblog and explain its importance to your readers. (Incidentally, you may not know that laws passed to target animal rights activists already make it illegal to protest outside Downing St. Which is a residence. This new 'exclusion zone' law is supposedly designed to target... organised crime.) Posted by Manic on July 28, 2005 12:11 AM in the category The War on Stupid Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Busy today - and probably tomorrow:
» Brian haw wins his legal loophole case and can continue to protest in Parliament Square - but the restrictions still apply to everybody else from Parliament Protest Tracked on July 29, 2005 12:38 PM Comments Hey there I just got this in e-mail. What is this about? Any truth to it? PASS IT ON! Posted by: HoytAxton at July 28, 2005 6:47 AM *Caca*fuego? Sounds like a joke to me. Posted by: Manic at July 28, 2005 9:21 AM The Cacafuego was a Spanish galleon captured by Sir Francis Drake, but the whole Rove email sounds like bullshit to me. Posted by: balders at July 28, 2005 11:21 AM So... how long before this starts getting spun as tying up police who are urgently needed elsewhere, I wonder? Posted by: Wolf Solent at July 28, 2005 1:09 PM As you may have now seen, Brian Haw has won his case with the argument that as his protest started four years ago, he's the only one not covered by the law. Ack.. can't get the trackback to work, so PING. Posted by: bookdrunk at July 29, 2005 1:54 PM In usual government-speak: "If the police choose to waste their time harrassing peaceful protesters and looking for bombs behind their signs where they are not going to be, this is a matter for them." Posted by: goatchurch at July 29, 2005 3:31 PM If you're still looking for slogans for banners and the like, what about "Burst the Bubble" or something along those lines? It's late so I can't decide if that's really obvious or really obscure (or indeed really rubbish). Either way, it's a bubble that definitely needs a good prick. (Choose your own punchline for that one though.) Posted by: Garry at July 30, 2005 1:47 AM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |