|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2004-2006 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« More BBC bloggage | Main | Praise Jesus and Question Tony Blair » December 21, 2005Don we now our gay apparelFa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la. BBC - Singers defy Parliament demo ban: Carol singers are to become the latest group to defy a ban on unauthorised protests around Parliament... A Scotland Yard spokeswoman was not able to comment on whether a carol service constituted a demonstration and said a decision about whether to take action would be taken on the day. Human Rights Act 1998: Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others... No restrictions shall be placed on the exercise of these rights other than such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. The 'decision on the day' would appear to hinge on the carol service being a danger to public safety or morality if it does not qualify as a demonstration* (though media scrutiny may also play a role). It's hard to see how we could be endangering public safety or morality if all we are doing is singing Christmas carols. And that is all we will be doing. There will be no placards, there will be no flyers. There will only be carol sheets and candles. We plan to arrive, pass out these carol sheets and candles (accepting any donations people care to give in exchange), sing our selection of Christian and secular verse, and then quietly depart after a short prayer. The only thing that can turn this into something other than a peaceful affair will be heavy-handed actions by the police. (* Section 132 of the Serious and Organised Crimes and Police Act 2005 - which appears to have written by an 8-year-old - bans demonstrations within a carefully defined area, but does not define what constitutes a demonstration. Technically, you could be arrested for anything from wearing a 'Make Poverty History' bracelet to demonstrating the correct way to use a potato peeler.) PS - Admittedly, we are open to a legal challenge over public safety if the turn-out is massive (i.e. if there are more people than Parliament Square can safely accommodate) but there is a contingency plan that covers this unlikely event. UPDATE - The main page for this is currently 2nd in MSN and 5th in Google for 'carol service'. Posted by Manic on December 21, 2005 9:13 AM in the category The War on Stupid Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments This is a tough one for me - being arrested really is not my thing, but I'd feel like I was betraying all the Brits who died fighting the Nazis in WWII if I didn't come along to this. This government's already trampled all over the international rule of law, the prohibition against torture, the right to a fair trial, and the independence of the judiciary. Free speech has to be the last line of defence - if that goes, then we really are screwed. I added something to Indymedia but it's not yet showing. When it appears, I think it may be here: Posted by: richard at December 21, 2005 10:33 AM This is an easy one for me. I'd feel like I was betraying all the Brits who died fighting the Baathists in Iraq if I didn't come along to this. Will there be mulled wine? I'll bring a video camera... Posted by: Guido Fawkes at December 21, 2005 10:52 AM There will *not* be any mulled wine (sorry), but there may be quiet beer or two afterward. :o) I don't plan on getting arrested myself (mind you, as organiser, I may not have much say in the matter)... but one does need to consider that no-one took this matter seriously until Maya Evans was arrested and convicted. Posted by: Manic at December 21, 2005 11:07 AM Sooooo?.... What happened? Posted by: snooo at December 21, 2005 9:03 PM Posted by: Manic at December 22, 2005 12:17 AM Posted by: Rachel North London at December 31, 2005 9:44 PM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |