|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2009 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Give respect, get respect (send a message to the Labour Party) | Main | My First Goatse » January 10, 2006Is the 'respect' campaign a half-baked gimmick?Well, you tell me... The domain name for the main campaign website (respect.gov.uk) was registered six days ago! Proof below the fold: Server Used: [ whois.ja.net ] respect.gov.uk = [ ] Posted by Manic on January 10, 2006 2:19 PM in the category Tony 'King Blair Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments You know, I was going to give the Respect Action Plan document a right old bollocking over at my place. I'm fast coming to the conclusion that it's unworthy of my time. Posted by: Chicken Yoghurt at January 10, 2006 2:34 PM - I agree with Chicken Yoghurt. Once again Blair hits the road with an ill-conceived campaign, presumably because he's missing the attention directed at Kennedy and the LibDems. See also http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/2006/01/showing_a_little_respect.html Posted by: balders at January 10, 2006 4:01 PM - So it's got nothing at all to do with Galloway being out of the picture for a fortnight then? Posted by: M Croz B at January 10, 2006 10:51 PM - Some gimmick: [Blair] acknowledged that many of the powers would change the burden of proof so that the accused would have to prove themselves innocent instead of the accuser having to prove guilt. "To get on top of 21st century crime, we need to accept that what works in practice is a measure of summary power with right of appeal," he said. http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20060110-020526-1106r Posted by: underblog at January 10, 2006 11:28 PM - But underblog, once again we have a situation where Blair is promising something he can't deliver. It isn't the first time he has come up with a scheme that would change the burden of proof, but in today's political climate he is less likely to get the neccessary powers granted by Parliament. Posted by: balders at January 11, 2006 8:18 AM - Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |