|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2009 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« DeLay and Abramoff - a quick linkdump | Main | God bless you, Major Joe Lazzari » January 10, 2006Sergeant Tim Nunn cares about your safetyBBC - Safety fears at 'illegal' protest: A police sergeant feared for his colleagues' safety at a demonstration over new laws banning protests near Parliament, a court has heard... Mr Nunn told the court Mr Shaer used a loud hailer to call the police fascists and accused them of trying to gag demonstrators... He said he ordered officers to withdraw in an attempt to let the protesters disperse but his colleagues became more tightly packed among the crowd. Mr Nunn told the court: "At this point I was concerned regarding the safety of the officers and so I instructed Pc Hunt and Pc Minnahan to start effecting the arrests." He said Mr Shaer was the focal point of the protest and when police arrested him Ms Gallastegui tried to drag him away. You'll pardon me for saying so, but what a load of unmitigated bullshit. Exhibit A - Immediately prior to arrests:
Exhibit B - The police move in:
Exhibit C - Pandemonium:
Exhibit D - Aqil Shaer is arrested:
(Original full-sized images can be seen here.) The arrest of Jeremy Corbyn would have caused Tony Blair's government some embarrassment. As would the arrest of Cherie Blair's sister, Lauren Booth, who was also present and active in this protest. It also needs to be pointed out that the primary reason for friction on the day was the police being deliberately and annoyingly coy about whether or not they were actually going to use these new powers. Even after people were arrested, they refused to say under which conditions/powers arrests were made. Police claims that safety concerns prompted the initial arrest of Aqil Shaer are false. Police claims that - at the time of arrest - Aqil Shaer was the focus of attention (and therefore the cause of alleged safety concerns) are also false. Lord Falconer appeared recently on Radio 4 to assure the public that this new legislation is fair in that it applies to 'everyone'. It isn't and it doesn't. It didn't apply to those of us demonstrating on December 21st, because this would have caused Tony Blair embarrassment*. It didn't apply to Jeremy Corbyn, because his arrest would have caused Tony Blair embarrassment. It didn't apply to Lauren Booth, because her arrest would have caused Tony Blair embarrassment. It did apply to Maya Evans, because allowing her to read out names of soldiers killed in Iraq at the Cenotaph would have caused Tony Blair embarrassment. And it may or may not apply to a certain gentleman who actually lives within the exclusion zone... a lot appears to depend on whether or not he intends to cause Tony Blair embarrassment: THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AND POLICE ACT - AN ABSOLUTELY GENUINE PHONE CALL FROM A TFT CONTRIBUTOR (*Allow me to clarify something I blogged the night of the carol service.... The police were hiding. Not keeping a low profile in order to avoid antagonising the crowd, but hiding. When I moved the crowd for (ahem) safety reasons, the backdrop for the media suddenly switched from the Treasury building to the gates of Parliament. About 30 seconds later, the police on duty at that gate received a call and immediately hid from view. The police were obviously under instructions not to be photographed anywhere near the event.) Posted by Manic on January 10, 2006 10:10 AM in the category The War on Stupid Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sergeant Tim Nunn cares about your safety:
» Day 1: Aug 1st SOCPA trial - Met Police Sergeant's claims of "safety fears" seem rather exaggerated from Parliament Protest Tracked on January 10, 2006 2:32 PM Comments Sublime! I actually feel quite sorry for the police, having to enforce this bonkers law. Posted by: richard at January 10, 2006 11:44 AM - I was fucking there and the police were in no bloody danger. Jesus, this law is a farce, how do they expect us to buy into this process when it's so corrupt and full of posturing. Is this what we've become? Posted by: Guy Gooberman at January 10, 2006 11:57 AM - Surely a pro Blair type "rally" is in order, celebrating all of his "achievements". Let's say thanks before he goes....... Posted by: Jan Pinkman at January 10, 2006 11:58 AM - Jan's idea would be great: have a pro-Bliar protest in one part of the "Designated Area" - without prior aproval of course - and have an anti-Bliar protest in another part at the same time, then see how the police react. Posted by: D-Notice at January 10, 2006 7:50 PM - Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |