|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2004-2006 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Face-time | Main | Guido's bluffs, toughs and fluffers » January 18, 2007Pax.The following is the full text from an email I sent this evening to someone from the 'other' side after the many developments following this post. A small level of detail has been changed to protect the identity of the recipient, but it's pretty much unedited. I'm going to post it as an intro to a peace-offering that I hope will keep the shouting down to a dull roar: Xxxxxxxx, Now, I'm pretty sure that Guido is not going to take up my ongoing offer of 'right of reply' for a number of reasons, not all of which implicate him on any specific charge I've laid against him. I also remain concerned about the effect Guido is having on the blogosphere. Nothing about that has changed. I stand by what I've posted, here and elsewhere (not including the elsewheres where you neither know me to be here nor there). However... I think we have reached a stage where people are talking about the wider issues... and, for now, that is enough for me. OK, so much for the line I'm trying to draw... now back to you: A lot depends on what Guido does after he reads this, and lot depends on what you do after you read this: If you're keen to address any/all points or claim that I've put Guido in an impossible position*, then feel free to do so. If you're keen to call me names, taunt me with empty jibes about jealousy or 'out' my hamster, then I wish you luck (he's staying right where he is). [*Sidebar: This is a link to a comment from an anonymous user using the comment features on Paul Linford's blog. Paul is on the fence, and - unsurprisingly - ends up with one of the few posts on this subject that edged toward mainstream media today... but if I don't say this, someone else will, and they'll probably be a dick about it; Paul, please think about setting your comment timestamps to show the time and date of any given comment. The more of us who do it, the better. Ta.] [MINI-UPDATE: Which is exactly what Paul has done. Top stuff!] But I would much rather move on and discuss matters like: - The importance of anonymity on an individual basis balanced with the crippling effect it can have your weblog and blogs in general if anonymity becomes too commonplace. - The importance of securing and building under your own domain name. - Our status as a community, the way we conduct ourselves, its impact on our community, and its impacton the communities we live in when we walk away from our computers. - Erm... now's not the time for a really, really long list; but there's a reason for all of this, and if you've talked to me recently or if you've been reading Bloggerheads within the past few months, you'll know what that reason is**. There'll be a lot of this as part of that... if that's your thing. [**Sidebar: Sorry it's late. Beta-testing soon. Promise.] So... here we go... a peace offering... and because there are wider issues here, I'm going to start off reeeeal gentle-like... - To Guido and all users of Blogger: If you have a Blogger weblog, I'd like you to seriously consider doing the following (if you haven't already); a) Introduce comment timestamps that show both the time and date of a comment
Hey, mate... your call. I'd really appreciate you doing the above, and it will be taken as a genuine sign of good faith. If you also introduce trackbacks/backlinks (even on a trial basis) or, alternatively, have a quiet word with Iain Dale to tone it down with the 'ideal blogger' bullshit (when you will be the first to admit that what most bloggers consider fair you couldn't give a tuppeny-stuff about), then you'll find I'll become a great deal calmer... but I still don't buy the concept of letting a tide wash over me***. [***Sidebar: Private 'joke'.]
Well, what more can I say? I'd love you to turn comment registration on, but we both know that this is going to cut down on comments. Even then, any old fool can sign up for a Blogger account and use an empty weblog as their base, but there are legal advantages to this extra filter that I'm sure you're already aware of. Have a ponder on it... and the type of comments currently going live that put your ongoing income at risk no matter what the hell I say about it. Don't think for a second that they add anything to your blog; just a glance around recent reactions for and against what I've said shows how many people find you entertaining, but the comments distasteful. - I'd like to think that that's pretty open and fair. Depending on how Guido reacts, I'm even open to the idea of moderating the original post in a way that makes it clear that ideas have been exchanged, my position has been moderated and/or an agreement or sorts has been reached***. [****Sidebar: To everyone saying 'Who does he think he is?', I'll need to remind you that search engines are already playing a role and a lot of people will visit the original post over the coming weeks/months. I think they deserve context.]
Cheers all. (PS - Sorry, Dennis. It's too late to goad me, but thanks for taking a belated interest.) Posted by Manic on January 18, 2007 12:06 AM in the category The Political Weblog Movement Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pax.:
» Big Bother from James Barbour Tracked on January 18, 2007 10:04 AM
» Celebrity ‘Big’ Blogger? Big Deal… from Ministry of Truth Tracked on January 18, 2007 12:27 PM Comments Surely 'moderating' the original post would render you guilty of one of the many crimes of which you're accusing Guido? By all means add a date-and-timestamped postscript, but the original text needs to remain otherwise the "context" you talk of becomes altered. As you say, Guido's strategy has been to exacerbate the shouting match rather than to address your criticisms - that's his way, and it would have been naive to expect anything else. So the criticisms remain mostly unanswered, from which we can draw our own conclusions. Personally I think we should just move along ... You've achieved your (presumed) objective of encouraging people to take Guido's writings (and probably your own) with rather a large pinch of salt. Question, though - was the 'peace offering' all part of the original plan? Posted by: James Barbour at January 18, 2007 9:24 AM "add a date-and-timestamped postscript": exactly what I had in mind. The peace offering isn't part of some grand Machiavellian scheme. As for what can or cannot be expected of Guido... well, I haven't seen or heard anything yet. Posted by: Manic at January 18, 2007 10:03 AM ""add a date-and-timestamped postscript": exactly what I had in mind." Righto - just clarifying. Posted by: James Barbour at January 18, 2007 10:11 AM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |