|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2009 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Go Green, Vote Kablooey | Main | A tricky question for the Met » March 12, 2007A tricky question for PraguetoryIn January of last year, Paul Staines (aka 'Guido Fawkes') repeatedly equated homosexuality with paedophilia: Bloggerheads January 23, 2006: "Our legal advice is that Mark Oaten is not a paedophile." He then refused to apologise for this or even acknowledge that he had done it... but somehow found time to delete all record of the words he claimed to stand by. (Yet another smooth move from the master of hypocrisy.) Since that time, there has been a single question (posed in variant forms, depending on the circumstances) that has vexed many supporters of the 'Guido' website. Here, you can witness Dizzy first dodging the question, then refusing to acknowledge the point. Last Friday, Praguetory faced that same question. It began with this post showing many examples of his hypocrisy: Bloggerheads March 9, 2007: Praguetory He responded with this: Praguetory March 9, 2007: The Rules On My Blog Blogging is a game, we make the rules. Here are the ones that govern my blog. I made them up. Note how he infers that the post about him was purely an objection to the way he behaves on his own website. This is not the case. It is Praguetory's behaviour on other weblogs that does the most damage; the cautious censorship of his own website mostly serves to show the breathtaking hypocrisy behind it all. Note also the entirely false suggestion that most deletions are due to the use of profanity. There is also the great and noble move by Praguetory to open himself up to criticism with a dedicated thread... thereby leaving individual articles unmolested. He is to be congratulated for inventing the blogging equivalent of a Free Speech Zone. There is more... but it will keep for now, and I know you're hankering for a reaction to that special question. So, here we go... starting with CuriousHamster rising from his funk and to the occasion. From the comments of the above post: CuriousHamster said... Oh dear... Praguetory tries to squirm out of it at the end, but I'm seeing the homosexual=paedophile equation at work here. Regardless, I feel that Praguetory deserves a repeat crack at the question, as he is currently working at a disadvantage; he is labouring under the delusion that, because I am critical of 'Guido', my transcript of the 'Guido'/Oaten affair cannot be trusted (there is logic there, if you don't look too close). If Praguetory would like to hear the relevant podcast in full, he only has to ask... I have a copy saved to my hard-drive, and so do many others*. [*You may not be aware that you have this file saved to disk; Paul Staines sent a copy of the podcast as an attachment. The email you're looking for is from 19 January 2006, from 'Guy Fawkes', and headed 'Guido and the Monkey Podcast Experiment'] When Praguetory has listened to the podcast in full and ascertained for himself that the transcript is accurate, then we can return to the question... and a few other matters. Over to you, Praguetory... UPDATE (4:31pm) - Tch. Still waiting on word from Praguetory. Meanwhile, CuriousHamster has this. Posted by Manic on March 12, 2007 1:56 PM in the category The Political Weblog Movement Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |