|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2009 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« The Wrong Door: awesome | Main | "Our legal advice is that Paul Staines is not a sex offender." » August 29, 2008David Singleton's circle of invention*sigh* Another 'journalist' gives his brain a holiday... On the matter of Tom Watson Vs. David Singleton, I have the following to say: Just for starters, it's not a case of Tom being upset that he didn't have "input in to this diagram", as if a sea of reliable data accidentally spat out a result that Tom didn't like... and I sincerely doubt that Tom is miffed that he missed his chance to take part in the creative process. It is instead a case of David Singleton airing a rumour and presenting it as a fact in the same breath. Take a look at the diagram produced by Singleton (reproduced here by Sam Coates). Tom Watson is clearly illustrated as being part of "a formidable network of political strategists and communications professionals working behind the scenes to smooth (David Miliband's) path to power", while his call-out box merely states that Tom is "now said to have switched allegiance from Brown to Miliband". At a stretch, Singleton might be able to get away with a bit of hearsay (around here he is said to have switched allegiance to the Camden goat-blowing set), but only if the illustration places Tom in a separate 'maybe' or 'unknown' position outside the network. And it doesn't. A picture can tell a thousand lies, and all that. Here, take an even closer look at the diagram. Can you spot any unbroken lines between Tom Watson and David Miliband? And to those who may *still* be uncertain about what the problem is, I offer this alternative diagram:
David Singleton - who claims to be a journalist and news editor and is therefore subject to the same And yet if you read the article that introduces the 'circle' nonsense, you will see that he found the time to extend that courtesy to others *and* note publicly where he tried and failed to make contact (highlights are mine)... [Psst! Here's a quick note for people who may not be aware of one very good reason why doing the latter is often important.] PR Week - Miliband eyes up comms chief for leadership drive And yet none of the above courtesies were extended to Tom when - and I hear this kind of thing is taken quite seriously by most politicians - it was being claimed that his political allegiances had changed dramatically. I am informed by Tom that this claim resulted in a disruptive and needless barrage of phone calls from lobby journalists wanting to know what the score was. I think David Singleton needs to start with an apology involving far more honesty and sincerity than his first effort. Perhaps he would even care to explain why he appears to have sought a response from some MPs and not others. Posted by Manic on August 29, 2008 12:39 PM in the category Old Media Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |