|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2004-2006 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Secret prisons and forbidden words | Main | Rebekah Wade: brazen hypocrite » November 4, 2005There's a Safety Elephant in my Inbox!At 5:28pm today, Charles Clarke showed me how serious he was about the hastily-announced consultation process (one can only wonder what brought *that* on) by actually asking me about my views on terrorism. 'Leading' doesn't begin to describe this 4-question survey.... but I shan't bother stamping my little feet about it because it's late, I have a Guy to cover in hairspray, and Talk Politics already has it covered. (I'm sure I don't need to remind you that this is the same department that brought you public roadshows conducted in secret.) UPDATE - More links can be found in comments and trackbacks, but I feel the need to highlight this, from Chicken Yoghurt: The debate on terror is a serious one and it needs adult contributions and a commitment to fair play and respect from all involved. Stunts like this do nothing but anger those able to see the fix, deceive those who aren't, and seek to lend a credibility to Clarke and his legislation which they have neither earned nor deserve. Yet another sign of the contempt in which the public is held by New Labour. Posted by Manic on November 4, 2005 9:00 PM in the category The War on Stupid Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference There's a Safety Elephant in my Inbox!:
» Charles Clarke's dubious Labour Party opinion poll on terrorism from Spy Blog Tracked on November 5, 2005 1:15 PM
» Rigging the Poll from davblog Tracked on November 5, 2005 1:15 PM
» Britblog Roundup # 38 from Tim Worstall Tracked on November 6, 2005 2:42 PM Comments I was just going to blog something on this, but then I thought "Nah, bloggerheads will have it covered". What fucking cheek. Posted by: underblog at November 4, 2005 9:32 PM Me, or Charles Clarke? :o) Posted by: Manic at November 5, 2005 8:10 AM Tim, tried to send a ping, but Haloscan keeps telling me your server won't allow it. Ah well. http://not-little-england.blogspot.com/2005/11/elsewherethe-labour-party-securing.html 'tis a very dodgy, and perhaps a little too blatent, attempt to garner support. Stoopid Elephant. Posted by: MatGB at November 5, 2005 3:06 PM My system never did like Haloscan. Oh well. Here are three more links for the mix: http://considerphlebas.blogspot.com/2005/11/politics-of-deception.html http://chickyog.blogspot.com/2005/11/eat-my-poll.html http://disillusionedkid.blogspot.com/2005/11/ask-stupid-questionnaire-get-stupid.html Posted by: Manic at November 5, 2005 4:40 PM Just received the very same e-mail from my MP, copied word-for-word from Clarke's message. I'm giving him both barrels. Posted by: Scaryduck at November 7, 2005 12:42 PM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |