|
home : best of bloggerheads : photoshopping : rupert murdoch : mps and weblogs : email tim ireland : search engine optimisation : viral marketing : weblog marketing |
|
| Bloggerheads Archives :: welcome to the hard shell | |
|
to front page to date archives to category archives national service © Tim Ireland 2004-2006 Design by Wibbler RSS | RSD | Atom |
|
|
« Goodbye, Tony Blair: Farewell Video and Pardons | Main | 'Mere' rendition and sheer audacity » June 20, 2007Ripped off: Emap earns an invoice (and some free advice)
Just before I left, I found myself chatting with a couple of chaps about Zoo and Nuts and their bad habit of publishing other people's work without permission or payment. I described it as 'a growing storm' that organisations like Emap (owners of Zoo Weekly) should be just a little more aware of and far more sensible about. Life being what it is, I arrived home to see an email telling me that an alternative 2012 logo that I produced and published two weeks ago was reproduced in Zoo (right)... without permission or payment. Recently, the people at Zoo have stopped pretending that these images are sent in by readers and have more or less admitted what some of us have suspected for quite some time; that they simply lift the bulk of the material for their 'You've Got Spam' feature from the front page of B3ta.com... in fact, the following message now appears in teeny-tiny print next to this weekly fixture (and appears to have been in use since February of this year): "Except where specified, all pics from B3ta.com. If you're the person who took any of the spam pics, let us know. We'd love to give you a credit" This appears to be a nod to the following PPA copyright advice; If you want to use a photograph and you are not using a picture agency (they usually manage the copyright) you will have to make every effort to find the person who took the photograph... If all else fails and you cannot ascertain who owns the copyright you could show that you have acted in good faith by putting a statement to say that although every effort has been made to acknowledge all copyrights contained in the [magazine] [article] you would be interested in hearing from any copyright holders who have not been acknowledged. But if you join me now on a short journey from image to creator, you can see that it's only three simple (and rather direct) steps from image to profile to my website. Even if they don't get that far, B3ta has a 'send a message to this user' feature. I don't think that 'every effort' was made to get in touch with me. In fact, it appears that no effort was made at all. Judging by some of the past disputes that have popped up on the B3ta.com messageboard, this is typical of Emap's attitude. Emap further complicate matters by dicking people around when they do get in touch to claim ownership. Emap are also fond of throwing freebies at copyright owners, instead of paying money (and sometimes I can't help but wonder if the sponsors know that their promotional goodies are used in this way). Further, they've been maintaining this attitude for so long now that it becomes less likely as each day passes that they'll be able to settle this ongoing matter amicably and/or without significant damage to their brand. Zoo is your chum, you see... your cheery, happy-go-lucky chum. That's a vulnerable brand, that is... and just take a look at some of the people involved in the past disputes that they've tried to settle, stymie or sweep under the carpet: Beau Bo D'Or, The Great Architect, HappyToast... just stop for a moment and have a think about what these people happen to be very skilled at. Also consider that they have an obvious ability to reach Zoo's readership. Emap should take a step back and look at what they're doing... for the sake of short-term gain, they're motivating gifted communicators to subvert or damage their brand. Sooner or later, this is going to blow up in their faces. Normally I invoice people for this kind of advice, but today I'll be invoicing Emap for their use of an image in circumstances where I can easily prove ownership. Later, I'll be blogging the response. (Tch... look at that... I've just become part of the problem.) UPDATE - Relevant B3ta.com thread. UPDATE (22 June) - Emap have offered to pay the invoice. Posted by Manic on June 20, 2007 11:40 AM in the category Photoshopping Pings (Trackback)For trackbacks, this is the URL: Comments I'm not sure I'd want my work to appear in the little boy wank mags even if I was given credit/paid. Posted by: septicisle at June 20, 2007 2:39 PM Oh, I agree. I would have loved to have been given the chance to actually make a decision about this. Posted by: Manic at June 20, 2007 2:44 PM Bbbut... They even managed to reprint it with your url watermark this time. How can they possibly say they've made every effort when the print itself tells people who you are? Gah! Posted by: MatGB at June 20, 2007 6:13 PM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you're new to Bloggerheads, you may need to be approved by the moderator before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) | |