This entry was posted on
Monday, September 28th, 2009 at
1:49 pm and is filed
under Old Media, The Political Weblog Movement, The War on Stupid, Tories! Tories! Tories!.
First of all, I should point out that Dominic Whiteman was the name used by Mercer’s (one assumes former) associate throughout their involvement with/via the organisation known as ‘Vigil’, but Dominic Wightman was the named used by bailiffs when they came calling (i.e. after Vigil failed to stay afloat on the illusion of numbers and mere promises of money).
Secondly, I should also make clear that, while I am not at all happy with the company he’s been keeping, Glen Jenvey (now Omar Hamza Jenvey) has ceased his attacks on me and any/all involvement in the shadowy world of amateur espionage. Further, he has also had the good grace to apologise. So while the question of Mercer’s level of involvement with Jenvey and his earlier deceptions remains open, any significant personal disagreement with Jenvey himself is firmly in the past.
Finally, before we get started, for the benefit of newcomers and regulars, I should also point out that these latest attacks on me happen primarily at the instigation of Dominic Wightman (who now also appears to have played a significant role in manipulating Jenvey into his ill-advised attacks). Most of the more actionable publications have been made using accounts in the name(s) of a group of people who call themselves the ‘Cheerleaders’ (who now claim to be terribly brave on the basis that some of their lesser members have been publishing my home address while using their ‘real names’), but this is simply another case of Dominic Wightman manipulating other people into doing his dirty work for him.
Wightman’s recent claims that he has only enjoyed light/tangential contact with these ‘Cheerleaders’ are lies, and I can prove it.
OK, there’s your basic sandwich… now, here’s the meat:
Patrick Mercer was recently forced into a humiliating climb-down after declaring that any suggestion that his office had worked with Jenvey was “a damaging lie”. Leaving aside that this ‘damaging lie’ came from his own earlier statement, Mercer was also proved wrong by evidence showing a working relationship between Jenvey and his office as late as March 2009. This resulted in “sources close to the MP” muttering something about it all depending on what your definition of ‘working’ is.
With tip of the hat to Richard Bartholomew for refreshing my memory, I now bring you further evidence that Patrick Mercer’s office also worked with Dominic Wightman (aka Dominic Whiteman):
Telegraph – Working on the internet from an anonymous city office, the shadowy figures exposing Islamic extremism
By Andrew Alderson, Chief Reporter
Published: 12:01AM GMT 19 Nov 2006
Vigil’s founders believe that the police, security and intelligence services are so overstretched that they need help. The organisation seeks to make Britain a safer place by disrupting and exposing terrorist activity. It is also working with media groups to highlight the threat from Muslim extremists… Only two of its staff are willing to be identified. One is Dominic Whiteman, its director and spokesman… The other Vigil operator willing to be identified is Glen Jenvey, 42, a freelance counter-intelligence investigator from Wiltshire…
Scotland Yard* confirmed it was “working closely with Vigil, particularly its director and spokesman who has made officers aware of chat-room material. This material will be considered and appropriate action taken.”
Patrick Mercer, the Tory spokesman for homeland security, has also worked with Vigil.
He said that he had been impressed by the group’s professionalism. “Anything of this nature that helps the security services has to be encouraged,” he said.
(*Scotland Yard, I will get to later…. if given the opportunity. They’ve been a bit shy about clarifying statements themselves.)
Glen Jenvey was behind this attack.
Dominic Wightman was behind a further attack, and is instrumental in these latest attacks (that include broadcasting of my home address to parties likely to be hostile to me, and repeated suggestions that I go back to the country I came from).
So that’s three attacks by two people who have worked in conjunction with Patrick Mercer’s office as part of that MP’s
fight for publicity struggle against extremism/terrorism.
Patrick Mercer could have ended this matter within days way back in January 2009, simply by considering the evidence, (including Jenvey’s accusations that the PCC were in league with extremists) arriving at the obvious conclusion, and making a statement… but this would have undermined his credibility (and, subsequently, that of the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Counter-Terrorism).
By not doing so, Mercer allowed The Sun to use his endorsement – with or without his knowledge – in their letter to the PCC, and kept the resulting dispute(s) going for weeks and then months; this delay in addressing the issue allowed Dominic Wightman to eventually catch wind of it and seek to exploit it (in order to exact revenge against his former ‘anti-terror’ associates, including Mercer).
Patrick Mercer was then privy to all sorts of information that would have caused him or any sensible person in his position to at least suspect the involvement of Dominic Wightman, particularly after the first and second attacks against me (when details not available to the general public were made available to his office and brought directly to his attention). Patrick Mercer chose not to involve himself or release/say anything beyond a single vague hint (that came weeks too late)… most probably because this too would have undermined his credibility (and, subsequently, that of the House of Commons Sub-Committee on Counter-Terrorism).
By avoiding any involvement or statement about his past/present relationship with Dominic Wightman, Mercer preserved his reputation in most quarters as a credible man of sound judgement… while he and/or his office staff stood by and allowed me to be smeared as a convicted paedophile, then an alcoholic with long-standing mental problems, and now a stalker.
Further, Mercer appears to have played an active role in the third/latest smear by privately making the quite specific (and false) claim to people asking questions about this matter that I am an “electronic stalker” and therefore not to be trusted.
He does this while knowing that I am being harassed/attacked by people who seek to intimidate me into silence and/or chase me out of the country.
The less charitable among you might be inclined to suspect that he is secretly hoping they will succeed.
Those of you who still have faith in his party or this Parliament will trust that he will not be allowed to do so in the face of this level of harassment, especially when it is now fuelled in part by his own false accusations:
By Guy Gooberman September 28, 2009 - 4:27 pm
Oh you have got to be kidding me.This is what the Internet does to people, it suddenly makes them all hard and make threats that they would NEVER have the nerve or lack of mental health to carry out.Seriously, give me a dessert spoon, a roll of gaffa and half an hour and these fannies would be screaming for their mums.Machete to your throat? I mean, have they actually ever held a knife or been on the receiving end of one as I have? Can they imagine the force of will and madness entailed in actually sticking someone?Fucking idiots, every last man jack of them.All the best in your struggles with these idiots Tim, be safe in the knowledge that you have decency and right on your side.
By BenSix September 28, 2009 - 7:26 pm
Maajid "Quillam Foundation" Nawaz seems to know these guys/gals…http://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/4429141136
By Manic September 28, 2009 - 9:35 pm
BenSix: As it happens, I've already asked Maajid about that. I'll let you know if he gets back with anything more than 'Who?'DHG: You may want to read your 2nd paragraph again, and then read your 3rd. Obviously, your torture scenario contains a healthy dose of jest (see: dessert spoon), but I hope you can see the minor contradiction that remains.:o)
By Guy Gooberman September 29, 2009 - 5:09 pm
You know me Tim, full of contradiction and a heavy dose of old school macho honour and whatnot, totally irrational of course but it stems from caring and seeing a good man dealt a bad hand.Forgive my bluster!
By Manic September 29, 2009 - 8:12 pm
Don't sweat it.And now, here's a cartoon for your enjoyment:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZgiVicpZGk