Hooray for hysteria

BBC – Arabic T-shirt sparks airport row: An architect of Iraqi descent has said he was forced to remove a T-shirt that bore the words “We will not be silent” before boarding a flight at New York. Raed Jarrar said security officials warned him his clothing was offensive after he checked in for a JetBlue flight to California on 12 August. (via)

See also a whole bunch of similar incidents:
BBC – Plane diversion reveals raw nerves
BBC – Malaga air duo ‘understand’ fears (plus)
AP – Passengers blamed for diversion get released
CBC – Muslim doctor kicked off United Air flight for praying

Still, it could be worse. So far, only the public and a few foreign jobsworths appear to have been infected with the hysteria virus… you really shouldn’t start to worry until representatives of local law enforcement catch the bug. Then you have to watch out for bombs and bullets.

Related bloggage:
Bloggerheads – Heathrow: mock-up, set-up, or cock-up?
Bloggerheads – They’ll never take our freedaaaarrrgh!
Bloggerheads – Giving it 101 percent
Bloggerheads – Blair: winning hearts and minds *and* the War on Terror
Bloggerheads – The Boy Who Cried Wolf








Posted in The War on Stupid | 5 Comments

Tony Blair owes me £2000

Tony Blair owes me £2000Tch!

It’s the day before my planned protest in Parliament Square, I’ve got my placard ready, the pamphlets are all printed and trimmed… but I haven’t heard a peep from the Met about my application.

[Insert SFX of phone call conducted ‘live’ for the studio audience.]

OK, I’ve just called them. Apparently, the primary issue is the Bank Holiday weekend and ‘some’ notifications only went out by mail yesterday.

Mine didn’t arrive in today’s mail, so I guess I’ll have to wait until tomorrow (the day of the protest) for my paperwork.

I say again: Tch!

PS – I scored a tasty treat at a boot sale this weekend. I am now the proud owner of a large and very noisy bell.

Clang! Clangity-clang-clang-clang!

UPDATE (31 Aug) – Authorisation has arrived. We are GO for Operation Deadbeat. Oh, and it may be a typo, but they’ve authorised my demonstration from 6am to 7pm.

(packs)
(leaves early)

UPDATE (1st Sep) – Goodness me… where to start….

Justin has a photo report and says; “A jolly good time was had by all.”

Rachel reports with a rundown of all the protests and says; “It was good humoured and entirely British, eccentric, determined, legal. For now. Just.”

Seconded. Seconded.

Here’s a BBC report and here are some screengrabs from the TV report… the naughty BBC reporter used a loudspeaker illegally live on television. Tut-tut.

More photos can be seen via D-Notice, Nether-World and Ham (via).

I waved my placard and rang my bell and told anyone who would listen that Tony Blair is a deadbeat who rips off hard-working consultants and doesn’t pay his bills. Said placard had precisely the desired effect, and anyone who asked me why Tony Blair owed me £2000 got about halfway through their question before they were swiftly furnished with a pamphlet that explained matters in detail. The text from that pamphlet appears below:

TONY BLAIR OWES ME £2000

Via a quirk in search engine results that followed a publicity stunt in 2000, a hoax email address that I created ‘for’ Tony Blair – tony-blair@prime-minister.co.uk – started getting regular email intended for the PM.

Clang! Clangity-clang-clang-clang!After a year of forwarding this email to his constituency office (at their request), I began a campaign for him to deliver on a 2001 election promise; that he would be more accessible to the public via email. This campaign began on 18th September 2002 and continued until the promised service was delivered.

On 20 January 2003, when no progress was being made and an insider at Downing Street assured me that such a service was widely regarded as ‘unworkable’, I drew upon my general expertise in internet communication and marketing (plus my rather specialised knowledge of how a simple published email address for Tony Blair would be used – and abused – by the public) and submitted/published full specifications for a workable service, including recommendations for a web-based interface with subject filtering and weekly ‘overview’ reports to be reviewed by the PM.

When it was eventually delivered (on 20th August, 2003 – almost a year after the campaign began) the new service used (wait for it) a web-based interface with subject filtering and monthly ‘overview’ reports to be reviewed by the PM.

Throughout the campaign, I was officially and studiously ignored by officials at Downing Street…with the exception of one happy week in February 2003 when Cherie Blair took an interest in my case. During that short period of contact, I took the trouble to ensure that the specifications had been received and read in full.

On 22 August 2003, I issued an invoice to Downing Street for £2000 to pay for the time that I spent on the relevant specifications (i.e. not including the time spent on general campaigning and/or the time spent forwarding emails intended for Tony Blair from September 2001 to September 2002).

That same invoice stated that; “an official statement from Downing St acknowledging my contribution to the project will be accepted in lieu of payment.”

Now, over three years later, neither a statement nor a payment has followed… and I’m just a little bit pissed off about that. Wouldn’t you be?

Tim Ireland
www.bloggerheads.com

Almost everyone else had applied for permission to protest in Parliament Square (apart from one chap who set up a protest at the Cenotaph) but I’d applied for permission to protest in Parliament Square and then march on Downing Street. Happily, my permission form only asked me for an estimate of the number of protestors (1) so – technically – anyone who wished to abandon their protest and join mine was legally permitted to do so.

:o)

So at 6:45pm myself and about half a dozen others marched on Downing Street for a lightning-strike attempt at door-step debt-collection. I approached the gates, curled Rachel’s placard into a megaphone and let rip:

“Tony Blair, the time has come for you to pay the £2000 you owe me. It’s been three years now, Tony… when are you going to pay me? (pause) Do you want your neighbours to know that you’re a deadbeat, Tony? (pause) I know you’re in there, Tony… I can hear the telly! (pause) Look, if you come out now, we can discuss this like gentlemen… I’d happily accept £200 as a down payment, but I know you’ve been having money trouble lately, so – if you wish – you can come out now and we can instead discuss refinancing at attractive High Street rates!”

Sadly, Tony chose to hide behind the sofa like the great big scaredy-cat that he is.

I didn’t get my £2000… I didn’t even get a down payment.

But… I did enjoy some not-so-quiet pints in the Red Lion afterwards and I hope to do so again one day very soon.

Cheers all.

UPDATE – Oooh, look! A fan! Someone who doesn’t like a lot of what the Blairites have done, but still plays the ‘soap dodger’ card bastards like this rely on.

UPDATE – A detailed report from D-Notice and some lovely photos from Chris King.








Posted in The War on Stupid | 3 Comments

Shhhh! Be vewy vewy quiet…

Stuff’s happening, but I’m not at liberty to comment. But I am free to say that – while all of this has been going on – there’s been a renewed attempt to ‘cleanse’ Anne Milton’s Wikipedia entry including a number of crafty edits where the link to the Anne Milton weblog is not removed, just ‘accidentally’ broken (and from an AOL account this time, instead of the facilities provided by Parliament). They get cleverer by the day…

UPDATE (3:28pm) – You may recall that I had some difficulty getting the Guildford Conservative Association to take an interest in recent developments. You may also recall that the Anne Milton weblog began by ‘outing’ a seemingly never-ending series of Tory activists, councillors, associates and/or family-members who posed as ordinary members of the public in her 2005 election campaign literature. Now, this may be a little taxing, but I want you to try to guess (before clicking) how many current senior members of the Guildford Conservative Association endorsed Anne Milton in this way.








Posted in Anne Milton | 4 Comments

A conveniently-timed and carefully-framed admission

Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome to the ‘debate’ the President of the United States….

George W. Bush Press Conference – August 21, 2006

THE PRESIDENT: You know, I’ve heard this theory about everything was just fine until we arrived, and kind of “we’re going to stir up the hornet’s nest” theory. It just doesn’t hold water, as far as I’m concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

Q What did Iraq have to do with that?

THE PRESIDENT: What did Iraq have to do with what?

Q The attack on the World Trade Center?

THE PRESIDENT: Nothing, except for it’s part of — and nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a — the lesson of September the 11th is, take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody has ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq. I have suggested, however, that resentment and the lack of hope create the breeding grounds for terrorists who are willing to use suiciders to kill to achieve an objective. I have made that case.

Yes, let’s just take it as read that neither the US nor the UK did anything in the Middle East to foster “resentment and the lack of hope” before September 11, 2001… or since (see: illegal detention, torture, napalm, etc. etc. etc.)

As for the other outright lie contained in this exchange, ThinkProgress has the poop:

ThinkProgress – Bush Now Says What He Wouldn’t Say Before War: Iraq Had ‘Nothing’ To Do With 9/11: To justify the war, Bush informed Congress on March 19, 2003 that acting against Iraq was consistent with “continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.” As ThinkProgress has repeatedly documented, Vice President Cheney cited “evidence” cooked up by Douglas Feith and others to claim it was “pretty well confirmed” that Iraq had contacts with 9/11 hijackers. More generally, in the lead-up to the war in Iraq, the administration encouraged the false impression that Saddam had a role in 9/11. Bush never stated then, as he does now, that Iraq had “nothing” to do with 9/11. Only after the Iraq war began did Bush candidly acknowledge that Iraq was not operationally linked to 9/11.

Finally, a few words about this and the ever-effective game of diverting attention from questionable foreign and domestic policy announcements and developments with an ongoing series of terror alerts. Here’s a lovely point made with the benefit of ‘hindsight’. Enjoy your read:

John Pilger – Lies, damned lies and terror warnings (3 December 2002)

UPDATE (9 Sep) – Wouldn’t you know it? Just over a week after this ‘candid’ answer (and on a Friday afternoon, naturally) a 2005 CIA report is released by the Senate Intelligence Committee stating this very same thing. Way to stay ahead of the game, George. Well done. Now go play with your magic time machine that lets you suggest that you thought this way all along. You lying, murdering, money-grubbing snotrag.








Posted in The War on Stupid | 1 Comment

Meanwhile…

Chicken Yoghurt – Community cohesion: Kelly falls at the first

Europhobia – The politics of hope (but mostly fear)

qwghlm.co.uk – Rise of the spineless fuckwits

BSSC – Politice

Craig Murray – “Murder in Samarkand” confiscated by Luton airport security

There are many dangerous people in this country doing extremely dangerous things… but I hope you don’t mind me sorting out the locals first. Cheers all.








Posted in The War on Stupid | Comments Off on Meanwhile…

Guildford Conservative smears (in a nutshell)

Here’s the short version for newcomers and those with short attention spans:

Since starting a weblog about my local MP (Anne Milton), I have been attacked online on a regular basis (both openly and anonymously) by two local Conservative campaigners, both of whom played an integral role in Anne Milton’s election campaign.

– Dennis Paul (Conservative campaigner for Worplesdon Borough Ward)
– Mike Chambers (Conservative campaigner for Onslow)

For the record: I am not a current member of the Liberal Democrats. I am not a former member of the Liberal Democrats. I am not a campaigner for the local Liberal Democrats, nor have I been at any stage in my life. I have done creative/production work for the Liberal Democrats in the past (and plan to do more), but I have also done creative/production work for a Conservative MP and a Labour MP (and plan to do more).

Nevertheless, these idiots are convinced (and/or seek to convince others) that I’m part of a vast Liberal Democrat conspiracy against them.

On August 16, 2006 I published evidence that closely associated both Dennis Paul and Mike Chambers with a series of anonymous weblogs that smear myself, a local Liberal Democrat campaigner, and the Liberal Democrats in general.

The smear against the local Liberal Democrat campaigner is by far the worst; at a weblog under the name ‘Jonesy12’, claims that he is a paedophile have been aired repeatedly and relentlessly.

The victim of this smear just happens to be the direct political opponent of Mike Chambers, and on August 22, 2006 I published irrefutable proof that Mike Chambers is directly responsible for the ‘Jonesy12′ weblog and the claims published there.

This has been brought to the attention of Mike Chambers’ employer (the Learning & Skills Council) as the ‘Jonesy12’ weblog appears to have been created/promoted from his work computer during work hours. I have been informed that an internal investigation is underway.

This has also been brought to the attention of Conservative Central Office. They referred it to Guildford Conservative Association. I have been in touch with them, but so far the only contact I have had has been with Anne Milton’s researcher.

But since all of this happened, further updates have been made to two of the anonymous weblogs, including the one I now know is owned and operated by Mike Chambers.

In short, no effective action has been taken by the local Conservatives.

And that’s why we are now at war.








Posted in Anne Milton | 4 Comments

Possible email fraud

A little job for all users of Bloggerheads:

It has come to my attention that a fraudulent Gmail account may have been set up in my name.

Do me favour and check your Inboxes for any emails from ireland.t AT gmail DOT com… because it ain’t from me.

Cheers.

UPDATE – Relax. Don’t bother. It appears to be one of life’s little coincidences.








Posted in Anne Milton | Comments Off on Possible email fraud

The Final Straw

Last night ‘Jonesy’ (aka Mike Chambers) made a further update to his paedo-smear weblog. The content is of little significance; what really matters here is that he obviously feels untouchable, sheltered as he is by the Tories that surround him.

So I have no choice but to take these bastards on. All of them.

Two emails appear below.

The first email was sent and directed to the following people:
Anne Milton (Conservative MP for Guildford)
Simon Hill (Parliamentary Researcher to Anne Milton MP)
Jonathan Lord (Chairman of the Guildford Conservative Association)
Councillor Andrew Hodges (Leader of Guildford Borough Council)
Sheila Kirkland (Conservative Councillor for Onslow)
Dennis Paul (Conservative campaigner for Worplesdon Borough Ward)
Mike Chambers (Conservative campaigner for Onslow)
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative MP for South West Surrey)
Paul Beresford (Conservative MP for Mole Valley)
Francis Maude (Conservative MP for Horsham)
Humfrey Malins (Conservative MP for Woking)
Michael Gove (Conservative MP for Surrey Heath)
Gerald Howarth (Conservative MP for Aldershot)
Crispin Blunt (Conservative MP for Reigate… and Anne’s MP)

A message to all local Conservative MPs, councillors and activists

WARNING: This is a public email, in that a copy of this (and the follow-up directed at Anne Milton) will shortly be published at the following URL (including details of all recipients):
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/the_final_straw.asp

Hello.

My name is Tim Ireland. I run the website Bloggerheads.com, which includes a sub-site that scrutinises the antics and affairs of my MP, Anne Milton:
http://www.google.co.uk/q=anne+milton
http://uk.search.yahoo.com/search?p=anne+milton
http://search.msn.co.uk/results.aspx?q=anne+milton

I also produced the first weblog by a Labour MP (Tom Watson) and the first weblog by a Conservative MP (Boris Johnson).

Oh, and I’m not a big fan of Tony Blair:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/06/denial_a_messag.asp

Also, while I may not be a big fan of the Conservative Party, I’m a big believer in tolerance; no matter what your views, I’m willing to hear any debate so long as that debate is conducted in a legal, civil and fair manner (thus my ongoing interest in the proper use of weblog technology).

But since I have begun my scrutiny of Anne Milton, I have been regularly hounded by two local Tory campaigners and key contributors to her election campaign… Dennis Paul (Conservative campaigner for Worplesdon Borough Ward) and Mike Chambers (Conservative campaigner for Onslow).

Here comes the important bit…

Dennis Paul and Mike Chambers have played an equal part in the creation/promotion of a number of anonymous weblog-based smears against me and others.

Further, Mike Chambers has been proven to be directly responsible for recklessly airing unsubstantiated claims that his direct political opponent is a paedophile.

You can see those claims being aired here:
http://jonesy12.blogspot.com/

You can see proof of Dennis Paul’s and Mike Chambers’ involvement here:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/proof_mike_chambers.asp
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/learning_skills_council.asp

Take a moment. You’ll need it.

Yes, it makes me sick, too.

Ready? On we go….

Despite my going public with all sorts of proof, this story has proven too ‘local’ for national press, and the key players know it. Basically, the buck has been passed to Anne Milton and it is her responsibility to deal with this affair… when it’s two of her most vocal supporters behind it!!

And how is she playing this…?

I’ll give you one single, solitary guess:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/anne_milton/2006/08/behind-smearing-wheel.html

And the result has been that – despite all of this going public on my website – Dennis Paul and Mike Chambers still feel bold enough to carry on as if nothing can touch them… because those in a position to do something about this think it best to play face-saving games instead of taking action.

I can understand the self-preservation instinct at work here… and I urge you to do the same when you read the following:

I cannot tolerate a world where a local campaigner can behave in such a disgraceful way with total impunity.

It is therefore time to change that world.

Two years ago, I called a halt to the aggressive nature of a project that urged other web users to set up websites that scrutinised their local MP:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/mps_weblogs.asp
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2005/01/calling_all_pro.asp

I was foolish enough to think that people in a position such as yours would – eventually – behave responsively and responsibly.

I was wrong.

In short; I no longer believe that it’s worth waiting for MPs to engage properly with their electorate online, so I plan to stop being Mr Nice Guy and instead raise an online army against any and all MPs not worth their salt… starting with you lot.

The upshot is that – any time someone searches for your name in any search engine – one of the top search results (if not the top search result) will be a website controlled by someone who knows you for what you are; someone willing to air every dirty, hopeless or dishonest act by yourself that’s too ‘insignificant’ to make it to print. This website will draw an audience of like-minded constituents, thereby generating further content.

Anne Milton’s problem is about to become your problem.

Think about that.

Anyone who stands by Anne Milton on this affair makes themselves a primary target.

And before you get on your high horse, go with a knee-jerk “I will not be threatened!” reaction and side with Milton, let me remind you what you will be standing for if you do so:

“It is perfectly OK to anonymously and viciously smear a political opponent by claiming that he’s a paedophile, so long as that opponent doesn’t complain about it.”

If you stand by that – hell, even if you’re just willing to back wayyyyy off and tolerate the hell out of it from a ‘safe’ distance – be prepared to suffer the consequences.

An email will follow that is directed to Anne Milton and her team. You will be CC’ed on that email.

By now, you know what the purpose of this action is, and I do honestly hope that you will support these aims:

1. The immediate removal of the ‘anonymous’ smears. All of them.
2. Punitive action against those responsible. All of them.

I advise you to take what action you can to further these aims or prepare yourselves for war.

As it stands, none of the MPs on my list have a web presence that can out-perform what most beginners can produce… and you are most definitely not dealing with beginners here.

Regards,

Tim Ireland
www.bloggerheads.com

PS – Before you dismiss this as an empty threat from a web-nutter, consider that I may well have carried on in a happy-slappy marketing world were it not for Downing Street’s devout belief that I would go away if ignored:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/can_weblogs/tony_blair.asp

The latter matter could have been settled quickly and quietly (and, I hope you would agree, entirely properly). But instead, I became a hardened online activist.

Now my sights are set on you. All thanks to Anne Milton and her little team of web-thugs. Whatever your decision, you may wish to take a moment someday to thank her for that.

This second email was directed to Anne Milton, but all of the listed parties were CC’ed:
Simon Hill (Parliamentary Researcher to Anne Milton MP)
Jonathan Lord (Chairman of the Guildford Conservative Association)
Councillor Andrew Hodges (Leader of Guildford Borough Council)
Sheila Kirkland (Conservative Councillor for Onslow)
Dennis Paul (Conservative campaigner for Worplesdon Borough Ward)
Mike Chambers (Conservative campaigner for Onslow)
Jeremy Hunt (Conservative MP for South West Surrey)
Paul Beresford (Conservative MP for Mole Valley)
Francis Maude (Conservative MP for Horsham)
Humfrey Malins (Conservative MP for Woking)
Michael Gove (Conservative MP for Surrey Heath)
Gerald Howarth (Conservative MP for Aldershot)
Crispin Blunt (Conservative MP for Reigate… and Anne’s MP)

Dear Anne,

You and I both know that Mike Chambers is ‘Jonesy’.
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/proof_mike_chambers.asp

Last night, Mike Chambers published a fresh comment at the Jonesy12 weblog, with a further airing of paedo-smears against his political opponent. Put simply, he feels untouchable.

Given all the buck-passing that’s gone on this week, one can only wonder why:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/perhaps_now_wel.asp

Given that the buck has stopped with you (and you continue to fob me off with your ‘stall and sweep’ plan by insisting that the ‘third party’ get in touch), this leaves us with only one of three possibilities:

1. That you have spoken to Mike Chambers about this, he has lied outright to you, and you were stupid enough to buy it.

2. That you have spoken to Mike Chambers about this, but you are powerless to stop him.

3. That you have not spoken to Mike Chambers about this because of your little political games.

4. That you really don’t need to speak to Mike Chambers about this because you know all about it and are complicit in this affair.

Dennis Paul and Mike Chambers have played an equal part in the creation/promotion of this and other ‘anonymous’ weblog-based smears.

Further, Mike Chambers – one of your local party representatives and a former member of your campaign team – has been proven to be directly responsible for a site that airs claims that his direct political opponent is a paedophile.

Despite this information going public, both parties still feel confident enough to carry on without a care in the world.

How would you feel if your name and address (your real address, not your fake ‘local’ address) were published with similar claims? What if such claims and details were published about one of your children* and that claim remained live on the internet just long enough for some idiot to come along, take the claims at face value, and decide to put a brick through their window… or worse?

(*Please don’t be stupid enough to take this as a veiled threat; unlike Mike Chambers and other members of your team, I’m not a total lowlife.)

Where is your heart, woman? Where is your BRAIN?

When a local campaigner can air unsubstantiated claims of paedophilia with impunity, there is something rotten at the core of local government.

Given that your first line of defence against the weblog that I run about you has always been the Dennis Paul / Mike Chambers team, I am inclined to think that you are the source of this rot.

And – on that final point – it doesn’t matter what I can and cannot prove on this front; our relationship has now changed forever.

If you did not find yourself deselected due to your laziness, dishonesty and/or sheer incompetence beforehand, the boundary changes at the next election would have been the end of the matter for me; I wouldn’t be your constituent.

No longer.

I now plan to hound you until your political career is in ruins, because you are unfit to hold public office. I see it as my civic duty to have you removed from office and called to account.

I used to afford an undue level of courtesy to those who associated themselves with you (hey, it’s politics).

No longer.

From here on in, no bystanders will be tolerated, no quarter will be given.

Me and you (and everyone associated with you)… we’re at war.

Well done, Mike.

Well done, Dennis.

Well done, you.

*claps*

Tim Ireland
www.bloggerheads.com

Get your war-boots on folks. Shortly I’ll be looking for bloggers in the Surrey area who think that their local MP deserves a little more scrutiny than they’re used to. If you don’t live in the Surrey area, don’t sweat it… there’ll be plenty of out-of-town work to go around.

UPDATE (6:05pm) – Michael Chambers just responded to this (from the email address michael.chambers@ycge.com) with the following:

I would like to unsubscribe. Please do not send me email again.

So I suppose now if I ever send him email he’ll try to have me arrested for spamming or something. What an idiot.








Posted in Anne Milton | 5 Comments

Dennis Paul is busy covering his tracks

Ahahahahahaha! Since the post with proof of Mike Chamber’s involvement went live, Dennis Paul’s weblog has gone live with three more anonymous comments. Dennis has also taken the precautionary measure of removing the link to his main website – dennispaul.org – from the relevant post (please note change of file name).

He’s removed the earlier anonymous comment that he made himself so he could berate himself for attacking… erm… himself (all of which was carefully recorded here and here), and he has now added/published the following…

Please remember that all of these comments were published within the space of a few minutes in the last hour:

I,m not political, but from what I can see, it looks like the liberals are putting up spoof blogsites sites, then pretending they are tory inspired.

It goes to show what lengths they will go to in order to mislead the public.

This is my very favourite comment by far. My hacking skills are so great that I can set up a limited company in Mike Chambers’ name.

First comment…”firewall”. Don’t make me laugh.

A number of liberal supporters in Guildford are graduates with computing expertese. They can hack through website visitors pc with ease – all they need is your IP address to target your computer.

These ‘blogsites’ are a venus fly trap to them. At a national level, Police intellegence use the same expertese to monitor and catch muslim extremists.

You only have to visit their site and they can target you. The best thing is to avoid their sites altogether, and avoid clicking on links that could take you to their site.

Ahahahahahahaha! Do not follow the links. Ignore these websites. Do not visit these websites. Stay instead here at the Dennis Paul weblog where you can feel warm, safe, and reliably informed.

I agree. If you click on links to these sites, who knows where it could take you.

Next thing you know, you could be on some paedo site with the Police knocking on your door accusing you of visiting innapropriate websites.

I say again; Ahahahahahahaha! Do not follow the links. Ignore these websites. Do not visit these websites. If you visit any of these websites, your computer will record that you have read the word ‘paedophile’ (on a site created by Mike Chambers, most likely in collusion with Dennis Paul) and the police will come knocking.

Oh, God… I find it hard to believe that I wore my big boots for this. A sturdy pair of slippers would have been more than sufficient.

UPDATE (11:29pm) – Dennis is back… and feeling very confident, by the looks of things. (Heh. Wouldn’t you know it? It’s just past closing time!)

UPDATE (12:58am) – My random synapse connections (a glorious gift from my childhood) bring forth the following memories and thoughts:

1. A Certain Conservative Blogger who pledged to “take the piss out of politicians; whatever their foibles” declaring (via email) over a paedo-scum moment of his own that in such cases one should; “Never explain, never apologise.”

2. A very early tangle with a guy by the name of Matt Vartan who – despite being caught bang-to-rights – had the audacity to ‘quote’ Churchill in his sign-off (“Don’t give up, don’t give up, don’t give up!”)… before retreating forever.

3. The sudden and unexpected appearance of a website dedicated to tracking self-important nutters like Stephen Green and John Beyer just as I was wondering how the hell I was going to manage said task all by myself. [Dennis and Mike: one to keep in mind…]

4. Again, the reason why I set up the Anne Milton weblog in the first place (and the agnostic inside me that is trying desperately to avoid the significance of my happening across Mike Chambers as the very first Milton-ringer).

5. Finally, something that keeps me going despite ‘assurances’ from Certain Conservative Bloggers that this is the way it has always been, and one should be willing to roll over and let it happen;

I’m just one guy trying to exercise his rights as a constituent. I have the guts to put my name to my efforts, and my reward is to have some anonymouth pose as me, making libellous claims about my professional and personal life. They seem to think that I should have rolled over and given up a long time ago, but I continually ask myself the question; “What would they get up to if they’re *weren’t* subjected to ample scrutiny?”

UPDATE (1:01am) – And I’d best add this; I haven’t really felt as if I were ‘back‘ until… right about now. Speaking of backs… Blair had better watch his.

[Psst! Some cool Flash stuff is headed your way… The first item will make you piss your pants. The second will make Dennis and Mike shit theirs.]

UPDATE (23 Aug 5:39pm) – Oh, God… talk about projection. Paranoia sets in over at Dennis Paul’s weblog

The computer I am using to access emails and visit a blogger website today was attacked as follows:

* 3.37pm. Intrusion.Win.MSSQL.worm.Helkern IP address 61.134.25.93
* 4.35pm. Intrusion.Win.MSSQL.worm.Helkern IP address 219.153.2.168
* 4.36pm. Intrusion.Win.MSSQL.worm.Helkern IP address 82.226.47.107

Must have been some local script kiddie…

Tha part to look forward to is when I prove that Dennis is directly involved with this or that and he blames hackers accessing his computer and posting stuff in his name. Oh, and he gets a golf-clap for his discovery of the term ‘script kiddie’…

UPDATE (23 Aug 8:50pm) – Speaking of feeling confident… ‘Jonesy’ (aka Mike Chambers) has just published a fresh comment at his weblog… nothing new; he’s just pressing and airing his paedo-smears as if nothing can touch him. One can only wonder why he thinks this

Chambers is a worm; this we know. What this proves (again) is that those who continue to endorse/protect him share the guilt in this.

UPDATE (24 Aug 4:25pm) – Hahahahaha! Dennis continues his ‘do not visit other websites’ message in an expansion of his recent post, and – as predicted – he also appears to be lining up his alibi:

Perhaps some of these links will explain some of the problems with blogging on dodgy sites. Take for example the problem of the Trojan Horse. Or those net pest script kiddies. It’s one thing them roaming randomly to hack a victim, but when they obtain your IP address through a visit to their site, then you could be at risk. You could find yourself becoming the victim of net bullying, or worse, if your children log on with too much detail, they are vulnerable to stalkers and paedophiles on the net. You could find criminals putting up material on your pc as this case showed.

The link for the case he cites is broken but I found it here. What it refers to – at worst – is undesirable ads appearing on a weblog without the owner’s knowledge…. but as this post points out; “It’s most likely that the person visiting (that) weblog had adware installed on their computer which inserted pornographic ads into the web page.”

UPDATE (29 Aug) – Dennis has now removed this post. At the risk of repeating myself: the man has a bad habit of deleting content once it’s (finally) clear to him that an argument has failed to go his way.








Posted in Anne Milton | 8 Comments

Perhaps now we’ll see some action…

This is a copy of another email I’ve just sent to relevant parties attached to Anne Milton’s office, Conservative Central Office, and the Learning & Skills Council regarding the antics of Dennis Paul and/or Mike Chambers (my earlier email can be read here):

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I now have proof that Mike Chambers is directly responsible for the weblog that aired unsubstantiated claims that his political opponent was a paedophile:
https://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2006/08/proof_mike_chambers.asp

Given that you are all senior representatives of organisations that Mike Chambers claims to represent, I would appreciate a statement from each of you about the appropriateness of such action before 5:30pm today.

Regards,

Tim Ireland
www.bloggerheads.com

I kind of new at this, so please forgive the following question:

If someone doesn’t reply to your email, and you know that they’ve received/read it, does that count as an official ‘no comment’…?

UPDATE (5:23pm) – Thanks for replies (under comments). Almost all of the people I’ve alerted have checked in or been chased up. Here’s the response so far:

The Learning & Skills Council finally got back to me. Their basic line is that the matter is still being investigated, and while “Mr Chambers has previously been warned not to use the LSC’s system for his private activities,” they cannot be held responsible for what he does out of work hours. This response completely ignores the fact that they as an organisation can quickly and easily bring this matter to a swift conclusion because – when Mike Chambers was posting using their time and facilities – he established a connection between himself and the ‘Jonesy’ blog. They hold, and have withheld, evidence that would have shut this down long before I was forced to go public with it. No statement regarding the appropriateness of this kind of behaviour has been delivered.

I had to chase Conservative Central Office on this matter by phone. They have ‘referred it to the local association’ (Guildford Conservatives) for action. When pressed for a statement regarding the appropriateness of this kind of behaviour (i.e. anonymously airing claims that your direct political opponent is a paedophile) they delivered a stern “no comment.”

Guildford Conservatives have yet to respond. But Anne Milton’s office was in touch earlier today; they continue to try and bluff their way through by insisting that the ‘third party’ get directly in touch with them. This position suggests that they have *nothing* to say about the website set up to smear myself (a constituent) by a current local party campaigner and a former member of Anne Milton’s campaign team. Further, they appear to hold the position that it’s OK for one of their number to anonymously and viciously smear a political opponent, so long as that opponent doesn’t complain about it. I think that this alone makes a statement regarding the appropriateness of this kind of behaviour surplus to requirements, but I’ll continue to press.








Posted in Anne Milton | 5 Comments